18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
14
18
Best position
#6
#8
#1
Average position
6.0
13.4
6.1
Latest test
2018
2026
2024
Available sizes
25
153
47

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison