18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Firestone Roadhawk

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Firestone Roadhawk

Firestone

Roadhawk

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Firestone

Roadhawk

Number of tests

1

14

21

Best position

#6

#8

#2

Average position

6.0

13.4

11.9

Latest test

2018

2026

2024

Available sizes

25

153

164

Wet

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Costs

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Fuel efficiency

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Comfort

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Interior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Dry

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Dry driving behavior

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison