18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

VS

BFGoodrich Advantage

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

BFGoodrich

Advantage

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

14

3

Best position

#6

#8

#2

Average position

6.0

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2018

2026

2025

Available sizes

25

153

34

Wet

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Costs

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison