18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

Apollo
Amazer 4G ECO
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
1
14
33
Best position
#6
#8
#1
Average position
6.0
13.4
4.1
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
Available sizes
25
153
658

Wet

Wet
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet braking
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet circle cornering
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Wet handling
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
50%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Interior noise
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Dry

Dry
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry driving behavior
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%

Costs

Costs
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Fuel efficiency
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
Mileage
Apollo Amazer 4G ECO
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison