Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

Budget

Apollo

Amazer 4G ECO

R13 – R15

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8

R14 – R20

Apollo

Alnac 4G Winter

6.0

R13 – R16

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Amazer 4G ECO

Advantage

Alnac 4G Winter

Number of tests

1

14

2

Best position

#6

#8

#12

Average position

6.0

13.4

13.5

Latest test

2018

2026

2024

Available sizes

25

153

56

Wet

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

70%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

73%

Wet handling

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

77%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

65%

Wet braking

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

77%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

83%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

65%

Comfort

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

63%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

77%

Exterior noise

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

50%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

76%

Dry

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

73%

Costs

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

79%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

70%

Mileage

Apollo Amazer 4G ECO

72%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

59%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Amazer 4G ECO vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

Amazer 4G ECO

Advantage

Alnac 4G Winter

Test Profile

Wet

Comfort

Dry

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison