Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Apollo

Alnac 4G

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Alnac 4G

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Number of tests

8

3

14

23

3

Best position

#2

#1

#2

Average position

18.9

3.3

3.6

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

77

40

188

176

34

Wet

Apollo Alnac 4G

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Apollo Alnac 4G

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Apollo Alnac 4G

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Apollo Alnac 4G

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Apollo Alnac 4G

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Apollo Alnac 4G

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet performance

Apollo Alnac 4G

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Dry

Apollo Alnac 4G

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Apollo Alnac 4G

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry performance

Apollo Alnac 4G

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

59%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Dry driving behavior

Apollo Alnac 4G

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Dry handling

Apollo Alnac 4G

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Apollo Alnac 4G

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Apollo Alnac 4G

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Apollo Alnac 4G

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Comfort

Apollo Alnac 4G

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Apollo Alnac 4G

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Apollo Alnac 4G

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Apollo Alnac 4G

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

Alnac 4G

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Blizzak 6

UltraGrip Performance+

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison