Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 97% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the Blizzak 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 2+ | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | 34.6 | 29.6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
