Arivo

We selected just a few of the many summer tyres on the market based on recent independent tests so you can quickly compare models that repeatedly appear in comparative reviews. Below are concise, evidence-based summaries of the tyres in our sample, with highlights from the latest test entries and the most important strengths and weaknesses to watch for. None of the three models in this selection show a newer replacement generation in our data set.

Apollo Aspire 4G
This tyre has been included in multiple Auto Bild test programs (2017, 2023 and 2024) in a range of common sizes, which is why we list it here: repeated test appearances indicate it is a mainstream, widely available summer profile. The test entries in our data do not include written verdicts or detailed pros/cons, so there are no explicit performance notes to cite from those comparisons. In practice that means the Aspire 4G is a frequently tested, mid-segment offering that merits consideration if you want a tyre with a track record of independent evaluation — but check size-specific test results or recent test reports for concrete braking, handling and wear figures before buying.

Apollo Alnac 4G
This tyre has shown up in several recent tests and generally rates as a mid-table performer. ADAC’s 2023 report gave the Alnac 4G a positive overall rating (“chvalitebné” / good) and specifically highlighted fuel efficiency as a plus. However, ADAC also pointed out some weaknesses: the tyre can feel unbalanced, with shortcomings on both dry and wet surfaces that led to downgrades in handling categories; the environmental profile and sustainability were judged poor, and the tyre was noted for relatively low mileage and higher wear. Earlier evaluations (ADAC 2021: “uspokojivé” / satisfactory) underline that the Alnac 4G is not top-tier for longevity or all-around grip, but it can be a reasonable choice if fuel economy is a priority and you accept trade-offs in wear and wet/dry balance.

Avon ZV7
Test results for the Avon ZV7 are mixed to negative in our recent entries. ADAC’s 2023 assessment rated it “dostatečné” (sufficient/poor) and flagged a number of concerns: while the tyre is described as relatively economical, it was judged unbalanced and weak on dry roads, and criticized for a poor environmental profile and sustainability. Test notes also call out very low mileage and high abrasion, which together indicate short service life and heavier wear. Other comparative tests (Autobild, and ACE in 2020 where it was “conditionally recommended” for some SUV sizes) show the model has been assessed across different vehicle types, but the consistent pattern is that the ZV7 trades economy for significant compromises in grip longevity and environmental performance. It is therefore less suitable if you prioritize dry handling, long tread life or lower abrasion.

How to use these summaries
- Treat these summaries as a starting point: size, vehicle type and the latest test year matter — always compare the exact size and year you need.
- If you value fuel efficiency and a lower purchase price, the Alnac 4G may be attractive, but be aware of wear and wet/dry handling limits.
- If long wear, low abrasion and balanced handling are priorities, avoid options that test poorly on mileage and dry performance (Avon ZV7 in these tests).
- For the Aspire 4G, consult the most recent full test reports for size-specific braking and wet/dry results to confirm suitability.

If you want, I can expand any of these entries into a fuller review with size-specific test numbers (braking distances, aquaplaning, wet/dry handling and wear figures) drawn from the original test reports.