Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Westlake) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Westlake (36%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 36% of the Westlake ZuperEco Z-107. The first tyre test of Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the ZuperEco Z-107 and the Turanza 6 were tested.
| # | Westlake ZuperEco Z-107
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 Lowcost
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Westlake ZuperEco Z-107 | 38,6 | 31,5 | |||||
| Bridgestone Turanza 6 | 36,9 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||