12 shops, 56 847 products

|

TheTyreLab.com
Vs
Nokian Wr Snowproof P
Bfgoodrich G Force Winter 2

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 also have B wet ratings.

#	Nokian WR Snowproof P /67%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R17 - R21	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 55

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 7x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 4.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 18.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 9.71

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P 2025

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

86%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

64%

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

58%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Nokian WR Snowproof P B

Dry

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Costs

(Overall rating)

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

72%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

62%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

85%

Nokian
WR Snowproof P

76%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P	36	26,2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2	2-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details