Segment
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Kumho (58%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has a better rating of 97% compared to 16% of the Kumho Ecsta PS91. The first tyre test of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS91 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the SportAuto 2023 225/40 R18 test, where both the Pilot Sport 4 S and the Ecsta PS91 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 62% of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has A wet grip rating, whereas 68% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Pilot Sport 4 S is made in United States and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
| # | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R18 - R23 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS91 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||