Segment
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (58%) than Linglong (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max HP010 and Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the EcowinG ES01 KH27 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max HP010
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Linglong Green-Max HP010 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Kumho EcowinG ES01 KH27 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||