Comparison: Laufenn G Fit 4S vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2

This comparison looks at two popular all‑season tyres tested across multiple Auto Bild test programmes: the Laufenn G Fit 4S and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Below we summarise test results, strengths and weaknesses and give a clear verdict on which tyre performs better overall.

Quick facts & test scores

• Laufenn G Fit 4S — our aggregated score: 64%. Test positions: 10/30 and 17/37 in Auto Bild test runs. Manufacturer: Laufenn.


• Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — our aggregated score: 88%. Test positions: 7/30 and 3/37, consistently in the top third. Made in CZ. Manufacturer: Continental. (Note: this model follows the original Continental AllSeasonContact.)

Summary of comparative test performance

• Wet performance: Continental is rated higher for wet handling and wet circle cornering and is repeatedly highlighted as a strong performer on wet surfaces. Laufenn is a "Nässespezialist" (wet specialist) in one summary but overall shows weaker wet reserves compared with Continental in head‑to‑head placements.


• Dry handling: Both tyres score well for dry handling in individual test metrics, but Continental’s dynamic behaviour earns better overall marks and higher test ranks.


• Snow & winter behaviour: Continental shows clear advantages in snow traction and short braking on ice/snow, described as a balanced multitalent with strong winter performance. Laufenn performs acceptably but is not class‑leading in snow.


• Noise & comfort: Laufenn is noted as the loudest rolling candidate in one test summary; Continental scores better for exterior noise and rolling resistance.


• Durability / mileage & economy: Continental’s only often‑mentioned downside is slightly reduced mileage expectations and a higher price point; Laufenn is repeatedly praised for value for money.

Strengths and weaknesses

• Laufenn G Fit 4S: Strengths — very good price/value, competent wet grip in some tests, acceptable dry handling. Weaknesses — noisy rolling, slightly weaker dry grip and overall test rank is mid‑table (64% overall).


• Continental AllSeasonContact 2: Strengths — consistently high marks for wet and snow handling, sportier and safer dynamics on wet roads, low exterior noise and good rolling resistance. Weaknesses — higher price and slightly limited mileage compared with budget rivals.

Which tyre is better overall?
Across the available Auto Bild tests and our aggregated scores, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 outperforms the Laufenn G Fit 4S in most key categories: wet braking and handling, snow traction and noise/efficiency metrics. Continental’s test positions (top‑10 and top‑3 placements) and an 88% score place it clearly ahead of the Laufenn (64%).

Recommendation
If you prioritise all‑round safety, wet and winter performance and lower exterior noise — and you’re prepared to pay a premium — choose the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 (manufacturer: Continental). If your budget is tight and you value price/performance above the last margin of wet/dry grip or noise, the Laufenn G Fit 4S (manufacturer: Laufenn) is a sound budget all‑season choice.

Neither model has been superseded by a newer replacement in our dataset — Continental’s AllSeasonContact 2 is the follow‑on to the original AllSeasonContact, but no later replacement is listed.