Segment
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SUV SNOW vs. Nokian WR SUV 4
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kormoran (19%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SUV SNOW was done in 2025, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SUV SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SUV SNOW
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Kormoran SUV SNOW Weak
