Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (GT) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than GT (47%). But when it comes to comparing GT Radial Champiro HPY and Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 225/45 R17 test, where both the Radial Champiro HPY and the Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | GT Radial Champiro HPY
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R19 | R17 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Premium2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Lowcost
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Exemplary2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Satisfactory
1. Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Recommended2. GT Radial Champiro HPY Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,2 | 0,8 | 3,0 | 1,3 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro HPY Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 1,5 | 2,8 | 3,2 | 2,0 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,8 | 2,3 | 3,3 | 1,9 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 100 | 266,5 | 187,9 | 63,2 | 96,1 | ||
| GT Radial Champiro HPY | 94,1 | 277,4 | 191,1 | 78,8 | 96,1 | ||
| Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 2 K117 | 97,7 | 287,2 | 191,5 | 77,9 | 100 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||