12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 225/45 R18 test, where both the ContiWinterContact TS 850P and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 63% of Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

#	Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P /0%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /81%

Dimensions	R16 - R22	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 112

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 16x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 1.

Worst position in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 12.

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

Average position in tests

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 3.56

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 2021

Best rating in test

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Exemplary

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 67%

Wet braking

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 85%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 62%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

Wet handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 63%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

74%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 74%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 75%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 76%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

71%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

66%

Dry braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 61%

Dry handling

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 81%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 63%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

78%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

77%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P C

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Continental
ContiWinterContact TS 850P

75%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 73%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 77%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P 72 dB

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	2+	2+	1
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2	1
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good	2	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good	1-	2	2	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Comparison: Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands