Segment
2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Lowcost
Comparison: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs. Linglong Grip Master 4S
Table of contents:
| # | Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Linglong Grip Master 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This comparison looks at two all‑season tyres tested across multiple Auto Bild test programs: the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and the Linglong Grip Master 4S. Both are positioned as all‑round solutions, but test results and lab evaluations place them at very different performance levels.
Summary of test positions: Continental consistently ranks at the top of its cohorts (e.g. 3rd of 37 and 5th of 35 in Auto Bild tests), while the Linglong is placed in the mid/low pack (14th of 37 and 20th of 35). This gap reflects clear differences highlighted in braking, handling and safety margins.
Key strengths — Continental AllSeasonContact 2:
- Excellent wet and snowy performance: multiple tests flag wet handling, wet braking and snow traction as standout attributes.
- Low exterior noise and good rolling resistance: praised for quiet operation and fuel‑friendly behaviour.
- Balanced, dynamic handling: described as an “all‑rounder” with sporty, secure behavior in mixed conditions.
- High overall test scores: our aggregated rating is 87%, reflecting top‑tier performance across conditions.
Weaknesses — Continental:
- Some tendency to understeer in aggressive manoeuvres noted in road tests.
- Average aquaplaning reserves in a few evaluations — competent but not class‑leading in extreme standing water scenarios.
- Premium positioning results in a relatively higher price compared with budget alternatives.
Key strengths — Linglong Grip Master 4S:
- Strong value-for-money: tests highlight price/value and comfort as its biggest selling points.
- Comfort and longevity: reviewers note good ride comfort and high mileage potential.
- Reliable dry‑road handling — stable and predictable on tarmac in non‑challenging conditions.
Weaknesses — Linglong:
- Weak wet and snowy performance: tests repeatedly show reduced grip and longer braking distances on wet and snow surfaces.
- Poorer aquaplaning reserves and limited safety margins in heavy rain or slush.
- Overall test rating is 59%, reflecting its budget positioning and trade‑offs in safety‑critical situations.
Head‑to‑head verdict:
Across mutual tests the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is clearly superior for drivers who prioritize safety, year‑round grip and low noise — it consistently finishes in the top tier and delivers short wet braking distances and strong snow traction. The Linglong Grip Master 4S is attractive for buyers on a budget seeking comfort and mileage, but it lags significantly in wet/snow performance and aquaplaning resistance. For mixed‑condition driving or colder climates the Continental is the recommended choice; for urban, low‑risk use with a tight budget the Linglong can be a sensible compromise.
Neither tyre in this comparison has been replaced by a newer model in our dataset. Explore full test pages and manufacturer information:
- Continental AllSeasonContact 2 — product page • Manufacturer: Continental
- Linglong Grip Master 4S — product page • Manufacturer: Linglong
Bottom line: choose the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 for top all‑season safety and balanced performance; choose the Linglong Grip Master 4S only if budget, comfort and mileage are your primary criteria and you accept trade‑offs in wet/snow safety.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 41.5 | 44.9 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 38.2 | 47.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | |||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 4 | 3+ | 4 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.0 | 53.6 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 40.2 | 59.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 41.3 | 53 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
