Comparison: ARIVO Carlforful A/S vs. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from . Generally, Ceat allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than ARIVO (0%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 215/55 R17 test, where both the Carlforful A/S and the 4 SeasonDrive X5 were tested.
| # | ARIVO Carlforful A/S
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | |||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow cornering
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 1 | 1 | ||||
| ARIVO Carlforful A/S Rating: Not recommended | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| CEAT 4 SeasonDrive X5 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
